Ram Puniyani
Since last two decades terrorist
violence has been added on to the weapons for polarizing communities along
religious lines. In Mumbai for example, we first witnessed the major blasts in
the wake of 92-93 post demolition violence, then blasts in the aftermath of
Gujarat carnage of 2002 and then 26/11 2008 attack from Kasab and company. This
shows the multifaceted nature, many causative factors, of terrorist violence.
In the similar vein, the country as a whole witnessed regular repeated violence
with loss of lots of lives. In the all India
chain of terror attacks, starting from attack on Sankat Mochan temple, Malegaon , blasts, Ajmer , Mecca masjid etc. so many
incidents shook the country. The investigation of these attacks is another
story mostly it has been guided by biases. Also since the investigation is
mired in mystery, many a kite flying about the etiology, the causative factors
and the identity of terrorists involved has become a routines story by now.
Each commentator and political tendency riding on their own hobby horses as far
as the identity of the personnel involved in acts of terror is concerned.
Mahabodhi Temple, Bodh Gaya Courtesy: Wikipedia |
Nine blasts hit the Bodh Gaya
holy shrine (8th July 2013). Fortunately the damage to lives was not
there; only two monks incurred some injury. Immediately after the blasts the
statement came that these blasts have been done by Indian Mujahidin operatives
to take revenge of atrocities by Buddhists on Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar . This
is by now a routine pattern that after every blast such statements have been
made about involvement of some Pakistan
based or group with Muslin identity and later some other truth, involvement of
the ilk of Swami Aseemanand for example, has regularly emerged. There was a
strong suspicion amongst those who have been following the acts of terror from
critical angle that Bodh Gaya terror act might have something to do with
Neetish Kumar walking out of NDA since Modi was appointed as the campaign
committee chief by BJP for 2014 parliamentary elections. In an address to Bihar
BJP workers Modi did talk of ‘teaching Neetish Kumar a lesson’. One knows that
Modi is likely to be projected as the next Prime Ministerial candidate from the
BJP side. As far as Indian Mujahideen, which is the first organization to be
named by some investigation agencies and immediately lapped up by BJP family,
is concerned many doubts have been raised about its role, its controllers and
so on. Same way SIMI has been the major whipping horse so far, from the side of
investigation agencies. SIMI was banned also. But when the ban was challenged,
Justice Lata Mittal Tribunal found no reason to ban it. In popular perception
this has been sunk deeply that SIMI is a terror outfit. The operatives of the
type of Kasab have been different cup of poison, dancing to the tune of Pakistan army
and Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda itself was a product of US policies to counter the
Russian occupation in Afghanistan .
This Al Qaeda impact on the
investigation agencies had been so strong that the American media’s coining of
the phrase ‘Islamic Terrorism’, in the wake of 9/11 WTC attack was converted
into the dictum, ‘All Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are
Muslims’ by communal forces and part of the media. This was the leading
understanding of Indian investigation agencies in the wake of most of the
terror blasts in India .
Starting from the Nanded blast of April 2006 to the blasts in Malegaon ,
Mecca ’s Masjid, Ajmer and Samjhauta Express, the same
principle was applied by the biased investigation agencies and led to the
arrests of hundreds of innocent Muslims ruining their careers for good and
demonizing the community as a whole. This also led to the process, which is
still on, fake encounters of Muslim youth, on different pretexts. BJP ruled
Gujarat led the pack in this direction and youth like Ishrat Jahan were killed
in cold blood; the alibi given was these terrorists, associated with Pakistan
based terror groups have come to kill the Gujarat Chief Minister Narnedra Modi.
Many a youth were done to death and lately with some investigations taking a
proper direction, many a police officers, who are acolytes of Modi are
currently cooling their heals in jails. Hemant Karkare played a very crucial
role in partly reversing this trend, when during the course of Malegaon blast
he could successfully catch the culprits, despite great opposition from the
leaders of Hindutva stable, the likes of Bal Thackeray and Narendra Modi
labeling Karkare as Deshdrohi (Anti National).
In case of Bodh Gaya tragedy the
association of this blast with Myanmar
incidents seems to be a deliberate propaganda to polarize the communities. More
so this is also aimed to pitch the Buddhists against Muslims. It has already
been propagated loudly and section of media is making this as the base of their
banner stories. From BJP camp, many of whose associates are
currently in jail for allegedly being involved in acts of terror, Ravi Shankar
Prasad said that “The media is saying that they (the perpetrators in the bakery
case) had done recce of the temple at Bodh Gaya. There were warnings but no
precaution was taken.” And that Bihar Government failed to take any preventing
action. Here, there is a clear hint to link the blasts with Mynmar tragic
events. In contrast Congress spokesperson Digvijaya Singh says that such
statements are an attempt to polarize the communities and the non BJP
Governments have to be more careful, more so Niteesh Kumar.
It is true that BJP has in mind
the forthcoming elections. By projecting Modi as the main contender
to lead the party, it has already alienated many an allies. So it has to ensure
that it should get more seats. It also knows that communal polarization is the
best ladder for it to ascend to the seat of power. So far communal violence has
been the major polarizing factor. As communal violence went up, the electoral
strength of BJP also went up. With the rise of terrorist violence, BJP has also
used terrorist violence to polarize the communities along religious lines,
leading to further the good harvest in the electoral fields. Why can’t we wait
till the investigations lead to some conclusions about ‘who did it’? The early
speculations are fraught with dangers. Linking it up with atrocities on
Rohingiya Muslims’ will further alienate them and make them more vulnerable. We
have seen such speculations have tormented the Muslim community to no end in
the wake of so many terror attacks in different parts of the country. One
concedes that there has to be a working hypothesis in investigations. Such
working hypothesis when biased and probably ‘non professional’ leads to the
vulnerable sections being subjected to atrocities of the highest order. One
major aspect which is being underplayed is the person Vinod Mistry, a
carpenter, whose ID card and bag were found on the spot. In the bag was the
robe of a Buddhist monk. What is the inference of this? Rihai Manch a Forum for
release of innocent Muslims in jails on the charges of terror attacks, points
out "the manner in which one finds mention of a name called Vinod
Mistry in this case and the way in which we are finding that clothes normally
worn by Buddhist monks were discovered from his possession and the manner in
which letters in Urdu were discovered from the temple, it rather vindicates
that it was an attempt to stage 'Malegaon' in Bodhgaya where fake beard was
found out and where due to wrong/biased inputs many innocent Muslims were
lodged in jail for quite some time till real culprits belonging to RSS were
discovered"
In Indian political chessboard,
the organizations taking inspiration from the ‘Hindu nation’ ideology; have
been at the forefront in so many acts of terror, Swami Aseemanand, Swami
Dayanand, Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and company. The mistaken hypothesis, ‘All
Terrorists are Muslims’ kept protecting them and deflecting the line to
investigation in wrong directions. What is needed is an unbiased objective
approach. While it is unfortunate that the holy place associated with Lord
Gautama Buddha has been targeted, one also feels that a professional unbiased
investigation should be undertaken and guilty punished. What is also needed
that the baseless linking of this terror attack to Rohingya Muslims be shunned
till the investigations reveal something substantive.
2 comments:
The quality of pictures from the CCTV cameras is pathetic and I doubt anything could be gleaned from their footage. I also wonder just how rigorous the recordings are. Detection and capture of the culprits requires good data obtained from an effective CCTV network and "espionage". In the absence of this, I doubt the NIA can identify/capture the terrorists. A lesson learnt from which we should start making the CCTV networks at sensitive sites more effective.
That's true. Effective CCTV footage would have enormously helped identifying the culprits. And, it would have thwarted attempts by vested interests spreading unsubstantiated stories before they have the evidence. As the legendary fictional character Sherlock Holmes said, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence"
Post a Comment